Client stories

Evidence from completed engagements

These accounts come from anonymised or permission-granted client work. Each references a specific report type, decision context, and outcome.

The revenue-range charts for our Busan warehouse expansion gave the board something concrete to debate. We used the low-case scenario to delay one lease signing—probably saved us a painful year.
— Han Seoyeon, Operations Director · Executive Forecast Report · Maritime logistics
Kim's capital allocation briefing ranked our three equipment options without forcing a single "winner." The payback timeline chart became the centrepiece of our February board packet.
— Lee Jiwon, Plant Manager · Capital Allocation Briefing · Precision components
Clear footnotes on every assumption. The only reservation: I wished the competitor landscape section had one more regional player included. Kim added it in the second revision without extra charge.
— Park Minjun, CFO · Market Entry Scenario Pack · Specialty food export
We have used the quarterly review for six cycles now. The variance callouts catch drift early—last Q2 the updated outlook flagged a channel mix shift two months before our sales team noticed.
— Choi Eunha, Strategy Lead · Quarterly Strategic Review · Consumer goods
The printed report quality matters more than I expected. Directors actually read it before meetings instead of glancing at slides. Briefing session ran long because they had real questions—sign of engagement, not a flaw.
— Yoon Taeyang, CEO · Executive Forecast Report · Regional retail chain

Case: Vietnam market entry for a Jeonju textile exporter

Report: Market Entry Scenario Pack · Timeline: March 2025 · Decision: Whether to open a Hanoi distribution partnership

The client had pilot sales through an agent but no structured forecast. Kim modelled three demand scenarios using Korean export statistics, regional competitor filings, and the client's margin data. The conservative scenario showed break-even in month 22—not month 14 as internal sales had assumed.

The executive committee approved a phased entry: six-month agent extension with volume triggers before committing to warehouse lease. Eight months later, actuals tracked close to the base scenario. The client renewed for a Quarterly Strategic Review to monitor the new channel.

Case: Capex choice between automation lines

Report: Capital Allocation Briefing · Timeline: November 2024 · Decision: Two competing production line investments

A family-owned metal fabricator needed to choose between a KRW 1.2B semi-automated line and a KRW 2.1B fully automated alternative. Internal engineering favoured the larger investment; the bank wanted payback evidence.

The briefing's sensitivity chart showed the fully automated line's advantage disappeared if utilisation stayed below 72%. Current utilisation was 68% and trending flat. The board approved the smaller line with a review trigger at 75% utilisation—documented in the report's recommendation section.

Considering a similar engagement? Describe your decision and we will indicate whether our report types fit.

Submit a Brief